If Ron Paul revolutionaries really want success, they have to ask themselves, "What is it that I really, really, really, really want?"

Liberal-progressives comprise about 20% of the voting population. Yet since 1960 conservatives have often helped liberal-progressives win elections by stubbornly staying at home whenever the GOP nominee "wasn't conservative enough." There is no question that liberal-progressive policies have eroded away the underpinnings of America. But it is conservatives who have been their enablers, it has been conservatives who have obstinately said, "If I can't vote for my candidate, let the enemy win."

Did conservatives all these years really want liberal-progressives to win elections? No? Then why did they act in such a way as to sabotage what they really wanted? What kind of self-sabotaging ego causes such self-destructive behavior?

Fast forward to 2012 and now it is many Ron Paul libertarians who are the ones acting like spoiled brats. Many Ron Paul supporters are saying, "If I can't have it my way ... my way! ... my way!! ... umph!!! ... then I'll just let my worst enemies rule the day."

If you are one of let's say 3% of voters who insist "Ron Paul or no one!" and Obama wins the 2012 election by let's say 2% of the vote, does it mean that you really wanted Obama for four more years? Does it mean that you really wanted U.S. debt to shove America over a cliff into bankruptcy, resulting in a strong-armed Obama dictatorial response "for our own good ... iron-fisted government in order to prevent chaos."

"Our man or no one" does not mean no one wins the election. It means a leftist who wants to be a dictator turning America into a leftist society wins the election. And a leftist society means a society descending into poverty, misery, and internal war between corrupt factions.

There is a libertarian argument that says, "Let it all fall apart. We'll be the ones who put it together again." Such an argument is madness. If a leftist is allowed to stay in power, then "it all falling apart" means libertarians may very well be arrested or in other ways harassed  for speaking out (for disturbing the liberal-progressive "peace").

It is a million times more efficient to get the worst group out of power while you can, then if necessary work on getting the next worst group out of power, then if necessary the next worst group, until finally your group is in power protecting the freedom of every group and individual.  Do not sit back and allow Obama to win re-election.

To really understand the evil psychology of modern "liberal progressives," read Ayn Rand's entire novel "Atlas Shrugged"

"God's laws will keep your minds at peace, because peace IS His Will, and His laws are established to uphold it. His are the laws of freedom, but yours are the laws of bondage. Since freedom and bondage are irreconcilable, their laws CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD TOGETHER. The laws of God work only for your good, and there ARE no other laws beside His. Everything else is merely lawLESS, and therefore chaotic." -Jesus Christ in A Course in Miracles